 |
| The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz |
Some noir begins with a murder.
Luis Buñuel begins with the desire to murder.
That difference changes everything.
The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz is not a conventional crime film, because its central figure is not exactly a successful criminal. He is something more absurd and more disturbing. A man who wants to be guilty. A man who dreams of murder as if murder were an artistic vocation. A man who confesses not because he has done what he imagines, but because his imagination has already condemned him in his own mind.
Released in Mexico in 1955, the film, originally titled Ensayo de un crimen, was directed and co written by Luis Buñuel. It stars Ernesto Alonso as Archibaldo, with Miroslava, Rita Macedo and Ariadna Welter among the central cast. The film is often described as a Mexican crime comedy, but that label is too small for what Buñuel is doing. It is also a dark comedy of desire, guilt, fantasy, Catholic residue, male vanity and failed violence. (Wikipedia)
This is noir, but seen through a cracked mirror.
Not the noir of the detective.
Not the noir of the gangster.
Not even exactly the noir of the murderer.
The noir of the man who wants his fantasy to become destiny, and keeps being humiliated by reality.
A murderer without murders
Archibaldo wants to be a murderer.
That should make him terrifying.
Instead, Buñuel makes him ridiculous, elegant, dangerous, childish and pitiful all at once.
The premise is one of the film’s great jokes. Archibaldo believes that he has the power to cause death, beginning with a childhood memory during the Mexican Revolution. A governess dies after he wishes her dead while a music box plays, and the boy grows into a man who associates desire, power, death and fantasy with that object. Instituto Cervantes summarizes the central mechanism clearly: as an adult, Archibaldo believes that several women close to him die because he wanted them dead, and he confesses to a judge because he believes he should be judged. (Instituto Cervantes)
This is where the film becomes much stranger than a thriller.
Archibaldo’s real crime is not action.
It is identification with the fantasy of action.
He does not simply want women dead. He wants the world to confirm that his desire matters. He wants reality to obey his inner theater.
That is where Buñuel finds the comedy and the horror.
The music box as original sin
The music box is the film’s sacred object.
Or rather, its ridiculous sacred object.
It is not a weapon in any practical sense. It is an object of memory, superstition and eroticized guilt. It links childhood, death, fantasy and power into one small machine.
In a different film, the music box might be gothic.
In Buñuel, it is comic theology.
Archibaldo treats the object as if it gives him access to a dark miracle. The music plays, the wish forms, death follows. That sequence becomes his private religion. He builds a whole identity around the idea that his desire has lethal power.
This is one of Buñuel’s sharpest jokes about guilt.
Archibaldo does not flee guilt.
He desires it.
He wants guilt to prove he exists at the center of the world.
Noir often gives us characters crushed by guilt after the crime. Buñuel gives us a man seduced by guilt before the crime can even happen.
Murder as aesthetic fantasy
Archibaldo does not want murder only as violence.
He wants it as form.
He imagines crime with staging, beauty, ritual, timing, object and image. He is less like a brute killer and more like a failed director trying to arrange reality into his preferred scene.
This is why the film feels so close to surreal noir.
The crime is not simply a legal event. It is a fantasy composition. A woman, a room, a razor, a wedding dress, a mannequin, a kiln, a prayer, a symbolic object. Archibaldo wants life to become the scene he has already rehearsed internally.
The Spanish title, Ensayo de un crimen, means something like rehearsal for a crime. That is perfect. (Wikipedia)
The film is not about crime completed.
It is about crime rehearsed.
And rehearsed.
And rehearsed again.
This is why Archibaldo is both funny and frightening. He does not live in reality. He lives in preparation for an image of himself as criminal.
The women who refuse his script
One of the film’s great pleasures is that the women do not obey Archibaldo’s fantasy.
They die, survive, escape, interrupt, deceive or are removed by circumstances outside his control. Again and again, he tries to become the author of death, and again and again the world steals authorship from him.
Criterion’s essay on Buñuel’s Mexican period describes the film’s central joke as that a would be serial killer keeps finding his intended victims already dead before he can murder them. (The Criterion Collection)
This is more than comic timing.
It is a philosophical insult.
Archibaldo wants to be the cause.
Reality says no.
He wants to be the center of the crime.
The world treats him as an accessory to his own fantasy.
That is Buñuel’s cruelty toward male obsession. The obsessed man believes his desire is profound because he feels it intensely. Buñuel shows that intensity is not the same as power.
Male vanity as crime scene
The real crime scene in the film is Archibaldo’s ego.
He wants to possess women, kill women, save women, punish women, idealize women and convert women into images in his own moral drama. But the deeper subject is not only misogyny. It is male vanity as metaphysics.
Archibaldo does not only desire women.
He desires a world in which women confirm his importance.
If one is pure, she can save him.
If one is sensual, she can tempt him.
If one is artificial, she can be destroyed as object.
If one dies, he can claim guilt.
The women become roles inside his self myth.
Buñuel’s joke is that they keep exceeding those roles. Their lives and deaths are not his to control. Even when the film enters violent fantasy, reality interrupts his authorship.
That makes the film a comedy of failed patriarchy.
A man wants to be the dark god of his private universe.
The universe keeps tripping him.
Catholic guilt without redemption
Buñuel’s cinema often circles Catholicism, ritual, sin and repression, but rarely in a pious way.
In The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz, guilt behaves like a perverse luxury. Archibaldo does not seek redemption in the deep spiritual sense. He seeks confirmation. He wants a judge, a priest, a moral system, a dead woman, a confession, something that will tell him his inner drama has weight.
This is why the confession structure is so sharp.
He confesses not because the law has caught him, but because he wants the law to recognize the grandeur of his imagined criminality. He wants moral authority to take his fantasy seriously.
Buñuel refuses him even that.
The judge’s logic punctures the fantasy. Desire is not enough. Imagination is not the same as crime. Archibaldo may be morally grotesque, but his great criminal destiny remains legally empty.
That emptiness is the joke.
And the punishment.
The mannequin and the artificial woman
The mannequin sequence is one of the film’s most Buñuelian images.
A woman becomes doubled by an object. Desire slips from living body to artificial body. Violence becomes possible against the substitute. Fantasy finds an object that cannot resist.
The mannequin is important because it exposes the structure of Archibaldo’s desire. He does not want the woman as person. He wants the woman as image. As surface. As ritual object. As scene.
When he turns toward the mannequin, the film reveals the artificial heart of his obsession.
The woman has already been turned into a figure inside his imagination. The mannequin merely makes that transformation visible.
This is why the scene feels so close to noir and surrealism at once.
Noir often turns women into fatal images.
Buñuel shows the sickness of that conversion.
Black comedy as moral acid
The film is funny.
But the laughter is corrosive.
VIFF describes the film as a kinky black comedy, steeped in Freud and the repressed, centered on a wealthy aesthete and amateur ceramicist who has a confession to make. (Vancouver International Film Festival)
That description gets close to the tone.
The comedy is not light. It is surgical. Buñuel uses comic timing to cut away the noble mask of crime. Archibaldo is not a tragic monster. He is a cultivated fool of desire. A man with aesthetic taste and moral childishness. A man who wants horror to ennoble him and instead becomes the joke inside his own confession.
This is black comedy as moral acid.
It dissolves the glamorous surface of evil.
What remains is vanity.
The failed serial killer as surreal detective of himself
Archibaldo investigates himself.
That is one of the film’s strangest structures.
He tells his story to authority. He organizes his memories. He arranges his supposed crimes. He builds the case against himself, but the case is absurd because his guilt is based on desire, coincidence and fantasy rather than completed action.
In this sense, he is a surreal detective of his own imaginary criminal life.
He gathers clues to prove his inner darkness has external power.
But every clue is unstable.
A woman dies, but not by his hand.
A fantasy forms, but reality interrupts.
An object seems magical, but may only be memory.
A confession appears serious, but becomes comedy.
The film turns investigation inward until the detective story collapses into psychoanalytic farce.
Mexican noir without the usual street
The film belongs to Buñuel’s Mexican period, but it is not Mexican noir in the usual urban crime sense.
There is no hardboiled street map.
No police procedural atmosphere.
No underworld realism.
Instead, the darkness comes through class, Catholic ritual, bourgeois interiors, the memory of revolution, private fantasy and the bizarre comedy of repressed desire. BAMPFA lists the film as a 1955 Mexican production, based on a novel by Rodolfo Usigli, which helps place it inside both Mexican cinema and literary adaptation. (bampfa.org)
That Mexican context matters because the film’s world is not abstract surrealism floating nowhere. It is tied to social class, domestic interiors, family background, religious imagery, and a post revolutionary memory that enters through childhood violence.
The result is not Hollywood noir.
It is something more slippery.
Mexican surreal noir.
The Revolution as childhood wound
The childhood death of the governess during the Mexican Revolution is not only a backstory.
It is the traumatic origin of Archibaldo’s fantasy.
A stray bullet, a child’s wish, a music box, a body. The randomness of history becomes misread as personal power. That misreading shapes the adult man.
This is one of the film’s most brilliant psychological moves.
Archibaldo converts political violence into private mythology.
A death caused by historical chaos becomes, in his mind, proof of his own dark agency. The child cannot understand randomness. The adult refuses to relinquish the fantasy of control.
That is the tragicomic root of the character.
History wounds him.
Vanity interprets the wound as power.
Why it is close to noir
At first glance, The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz may seem too comic, too surreal, too Buñuelian to sit beside noir.
But the connection is strong.
It has obsession.
Confession.
Death.
Erotic fantasy.
A man trapped by his own image of desire.
Women turned into fatal projections.
Rooms charged with guilt.
Objects that carry memory.
A structure of crime without moral innocence.
The difference is tone. Traditional noir often takes the fall seriously. Buñuel laughs at the fall while showing that the impulse behind it is still dangerous.
This makes the film especially valuable for a noir archive.
It expands noir away from only shadow and crime into fantasy, repression and black comedy.
The absurdity of masculinity
One of the sharpest ways to read the film is as an attack on masculine self importance.
Archibaldo does not simply want women.
He wants to be the kind of man who matters enough to destroy them.
That is a horrible desire, but Buñuel refuses to make it grand. The film keeps humiliating him. His plans fail. Other forces intervene. The women escape his authorship. The law does not treat him as the great criminal he imagines himself to be.
This is devastating.
A noir antihero often wants control and loses it.
Archibaldo wants the prestige of damnation and cannot even achieve that properly.
He is not the master criminal of his fantasy.
He is a man rehearsing a role that reality will not cast him in.
The kiln and the secret pleasure of destruction
The kiln sequence matters because it gives Archibaldo a substitute victory.
He cannot fully control the living woman.
So he turns to the artificial double.
The melting or burning of the mannequin becomes his rehearsal of violence, his aesthetic substitute for murder, his secret theater of destruction. It is grotesque, funny and disturbing because it reveals the pleasure he takes in symbolic annihilation.
Buñuel understands that symbolic violence is not innocent simply because it is symbolic.
The substitute object allows the fantasy to speak.
It tells us what the character wants reality to become.
This is one of the most unsettling noir ideas in the film.
The crime may not happen.
The desire for the crime is still real.
Why the film remains fresh
The film remains fresh because it is not trapped by one genre.
It is crime comedy.
It is surrealism.
It is black comedy.
It is psychological farce.
It is a murder fantasy.
It is a critique of bourgeois male desire.
It is a Catholic guilt machine that breaks into laughter.
It is also much darker than many straightforward crime films because it understands that the imagination can be morally revealing even when action fails.
The film does not ask only what Archibaldo does.
It asks what he wants.
Then it asks what kind of person would need that desire to be recognized as destiny.
That question has not aged.
The Dark Jazz Radio reading
For Dark Jazz Radio, The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz belongs in the surreal noir wing.
It is not a standard noir film.
That is exactly why it matters.
It gives the archive another angle: murder fantasy rather than murder, male obsession rather than detective logic, black comedy rather than fatal solemnity, Mexico rather than the American city, Buñuel rather than the Hollywood crime machine.
It can connect naturally with articles on desire, shame, surreal noir, Mexican noir, weird cinema, dream logic and the broken male self.
It also helps prevent the film section from becoming too predictable.
A noir site should not only follow the detective.
Sometimes it should follow the man who wants to be guilty and discovers that even guilt will not obey him.
Why it matters now
The film matters now because it exposes a form of fantasy that remains recognizable.
The fantasy of male centrality.
The fantasy that desire is destiny.
The fantasy that women exist inside the drama of a man’s self image.
The fantasy that violent imagination proves depth.
Buñuel turns all of this into comedy, but the comedy does not make the critique softer. It makes it sharper. By laughing at Archibaldo, the film refuses to grant him tragic prestige.
That refusal is the point.
Some darkness is not noble.
Some darkness is vanity dressed as fate.
Final thought
The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz is one of Buñuel’s great comedies of failed evil.
A man wants to be a murderer.
Women die, but not by his hand.
Desire burns, but reality interrupts.
A music box becomes a private theology.
A mannequin becomes a substitute victim.
A confession becomes a joke against the confessor.
This is not noir in the ordinary costume.
It is noir as rehearsal.
Noir as fantasy.
Noir as male vanity exposed by surreal comedy.
Archibaldo wants to make murder into destiny.
Buñuel shows something colder and funnier.
Sometimes the criminal imagination is real.
But reality refuses to give it the dignity of success.
For more films where desire, guilt and fantasy turn the mind into a crime scene, enter the hidden cinema archive of Dark Jazz Radio.
Bibliography
The Criminal Life of Archibaldo de la Cruz, originally titled Ensayo de un crimen, is a 1955 Mexican crime comedy directed and co written by Luis Buñuel, starring Ernesto Alonso, Miroslava, Rita Macedo and Ariadna Welter. (Wikipedia)
BAMPFA lists the film as a 1955 Mexican production in Spanish, based on a novel by Rodolfo Usigli. (bampfa.org)
Criterion’s essay on Buñuel in Mexico describes the film as centered on a would be serial killer whose intended victims keep dying before he can murder them. (The Criterion Collection)
Instituto Cervantes summarizes the film around Archibaldo’s childhood memory of his governess’s death, his belief that he caused the deaths of women close to him, and his confession before a judge. (Instituto Cervantes)
VIFF describes the film as a kinky black comedy, steeped in Freud and the repressed, centered on a wealthy aesthete and amateur ceramicist with a confession to make. (Vancouver International Film Festival)
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.